REVIEW: “THAT DAMNED COYOTE HILL”

Posted by Mike Dennis | Posted in Reviews | Posted on Thursday, October 20, 2011 at 3:02 PM

Tagged Under : , , , ,

THAT DAMNED COYOTE HILL by Heath Lowrance (2011)

Reviewed by Mike Dennis

Enigmatic stranger rides into town, kicks ass, rides out.

You’ve seen it a thousand times, right? Didn’t most Randolph Scott movies follow that story line? Some might say that terse little synopsis sums up Heath Lowrance’s short story, That Damned Coyote Hill. But if they said that, they’d fall way short of nailing the essence of this riveting western-horror-noir tale that defies all known genre boundaries. You’ve never seen that story line unfold like this.

Set in the Old West town of Coyote Hill, Lowrance’s stranger shows up in a driving rain as two fight promoters are issuing challenges on behalf of their fighter. Money changes hands, cowboys step up to face the fighter, aptly named Goliath Bunker, and the spectators look on, all of them oddly mute. Hawthorne, the laconic, Charles Bronson-ish stranger, steps forward and everything changes. I’ll just leave it at that.

Lowrance, who shot onto my radar with his terrific debut novel, The Bastard Hand, has shown he’s not afraid to take chances, to take the reader into parts utterly unknown. The beginning of The Bastard Hand threw me a real curve ball, catching me totally off guard, but his prose kept me turning the page. I know this about him now, so I’ll delve into anything he writes, knowing he can transport me to uncharted areas of fiction. And That Damned Coyote Hill fulfills that promise. Lowrance has vowed to keep the Hawthorne stories coming, and when he does, I’ll be there to pick up the next one.

A great story, highly recommended.

REVIEW: “BAD JUJU & OTHER TALES OF MADNESS AND MAYHEM”

Posted by Mike Dennis | Posted in Reviews | Posted on Wednesday, October 12, 2011 at 10:28 AM

Tagged Under : , , ,

BAD JUJU & OTHER TALES OF MADNESS AND MAYHEM by Jonathan Woods (2010)

Review by Mike Dennis

You’ll never take me alive, coppers.”

Been awhile since you’ve heard that line, right. Sounds like it was lifted straight from a 1930s Jimmy Cagney movie, doesn’t it? Probably hasn’t been used in literature in at least that long, right?

Well, Jonathan Woods uses it, and to great effect, in Looking For Goa, one of the stunning entries in Bad Juju & Other Tales Of Madness And Mayhem, his 2010 collection of edgy short stories. This snappy read by New Pulp Press has broken new ground for avant-garde noir with Woods, one of the early additions to their string of original voices.

In this debut book, which features an outstanding cover designed by Kenney Mencher, Woods offers tales from the inner city to the tropics to rural America, characters who hover over the abyss while maintaining at least a shred of humanity. One by one, they march to the edge, each time as a result of their own bad choices, and then, in true noir fashion, wonder how they got there.

In fact, Woods’ central characters are for the most part average Joes and Janes, who just want to get through life without any hassles. For them, however, “getting through life” often entails activities such as adultery, bank robbery, and murder. If only they wouldn’t have to get in trouble for doing these things! Why doesn’t everyone just leave them alone?

In Then What Happened, Bill and Inez are getting together for a little afternoon frolic while Inez’s husband is out of town. Bill narrates: “Rearing like Godzilla from the depths of Tokyo Bay, I fall forward, burying my face in her crotch.” You get the idea. They’re having a grand old time while the TV is showing Barbara Stanwyck planning to murder her husband in Double Indemnity. Everything is just wonderful, but then…

Ah, there’s always a “but then”, isn’t there. For Bill and Inez, it leads them straight into one of Woods’ nightmare scenarios, and before you can say “Kiss me deadly”, they’re ass-deep in hell.

There’s a story of a slimy, slithering wormlike animal crawling up the nose of Ray, the central character in What The Fuck Was That? Is it just some frightened little creature who has lost its way? Is this the opening salvo of a race of brain-devouring worms from outer space looking to conquer Earth? Or did Ray hallucinate the whole thing? The author doesn’t stop with alien worms. He throws a story at you about a tiger shark on the cusp of evolutionary upheaval.

The stories are crisp, punchy, and most importantly, not what you’re expecting. Woods has taken plenty of chances here, running out to the end of the limb with his offbeat take on the short story. With Bad Juju, he’s strapped the format onto his back and carried it into thick, unmapped jungle, chopping his way through it with a perfect mix of sharp prose, black humor, and vivid plots. His next book is going to be a novel, and I for one, will be looking forward to it.

ROSEBUD

Posted by Mike Dennis | Posted in Personal, Reviews | Posted on Saturday, October 8, 2011 at 4:10 PM

Tagged Under : , , , ,

“I don’t think any word can explain a man’s life. No, I guess Rosebud is just a piece in a jigsaw puzzle. A missing piece.”

So ends what might be the greatest film of all time, Citizen Kane.

Readers of this blog know that a week or so ago, I picked up the 70th Anniversary boxed edition of Citizen Kane, and described its contents at length. I also proclaimed it to be well worth the money. Now that I’ve watched all the DVDs, I can easily say my proclamation was correct. It’s a great buy.

The film itself was digitally remastered frame-by-frame. I can’t even imagine how long that must have taken, or the skill involved. And it’s even more remarkable when you realize the original negative to the film no longer exists. The final result is breathtaking in its beauty. Welles’ long shots, with their now-famous depth-of-field innovations spring to life in sharp clarity.

Another thing Welles pulled off in the film was many long, no-cut takes. He would later become famous for this technique in the opening scene of his later film, Touch Of Evil, but in Citizen Kane, he used them to great advantage. You could make the case that Welles was really a stage actor, accustomed to long scenes, so he brought this sensibility with him to the Kane set. These scenes, in the hands of a lesser “stage actor”, might have made the whole film look like a photographed stage play, certain to put the audience to sleep.

Instead, as Peter Bogdanovich pointed out in his outstanding commentary to the film, Welles used unusual camera angles and movement, along with lighting techniques never before tried. When you see these scenes after Bogdanovich’s explanations, it dawns on you what an incredible imagination Welles possessed.

There’s a DVD documentary included in this set called The Battle For Citizen Kane, which outlines the trouble and controversy Welles faced once it got out that the film was a thinly-veiled biography of newspaper mogul William Randolph Hearst. The documentary traces the lives of both Welles and Hearst from their childhoods, transforming them into breathing humans. Their egos were enormous, and Welles, even at 26, was clearly not cowed by the much older, more powerful Hearst.

RKO executives, who were not even allowed on the secretive Kane set, were furious once they learned the truth. Hearst threatened to refuse all advertising for RKO films, a move which might have put the studio under. He also leaned hard on the other studios, promising to plaster the country with newspaper headlines about how the Jews really ran the movie business, a fact not generally known outside Hollywood at the time. Fearing Hearst and his power to singlehandedly damage their industry, a consortium of studio heads, led by Louis B Mayer of MGM, approached RKO, offering more than $800,000 in exchange for the negative and all existing prints of Citizen Kane, for the purpose of burning them. This amount would have covered all RKO’s expenses in the shooting of the film, plus added a little profit for the studio. I shudder when I think about what we would have missed, what the movie world would have missed, had RKO accepted the offer. Seventy years later, filmmakers are still learning from Welles’ masterpiece.

Another thing I learned from this great boxed set is that Welles wanted to make Citizen Kane with actors who had never previously appeared in movies. In Bogdanovich’s commentary, he mentions that Welles almost succeeded. There was a scene with two waiters, and it seems that one of them didn’t make the call, so Welles had to hire a studio extra who had appeared in many other films, mostly as a waiter. Welles was very upset with this despoiling of his “perfect” cast.

A third DVD in the set contained the HBO film, RKO 281, with Liev Schreiber as a very convincing Welles. It chronicled Welles’ tribulations in making the film and its aftermath. John Malkovich as screenwriter Herman Mankiewicz is a standout.

There are other little extras in the set, which I mentioned in my previous blog, such as a slim hardcover book about the film and poster repros, but one final thing I want to say here is a tribute to Dorothy Comingore, who played Suzan Alexander, Kane’s mistress. A tragic character, she was molded by Kane as an opera singer, down to the last detail. Her lack of singing talent quickly became apparent, and she became the one thing Kane could not create with his will and his money.

Comingore turns in what is arguably the best performance of the entire film, topping even Welles himself. At first glance, it looks like she doesn’t do much except sit around and work jigsaw puzzles, but at second glance, you begin to realize she’s a powerhouse actress, bringing this complex character to life in a very original way. As one might expect, Comingore was offered many choice parts after Kane, but she turned them all down, thinking none of them were good enough, and her career soon faded. She died an alcoholic in 1971 at 58.

AND NOW FOR A LITTLE HERESY…

Posted by Mike Dennis | Posted in Film Noir, Reviews | Posted on Tuesday, October 4, 2011 at 4:34 PM

Tagged Under : , , , ,

Okay, everyone get your tomatoes ready to throw at me. I’m a sitting duck for this one.

I watched the 1967 film noir, Point Blank the other night. Believe it or not, I had never seen this film, although I’d always wanted to. It has rarely been on television and no one I know owns a copy of it. Frankly, it never occurred to me to buy it, since I’d never seen it.

But as I’m sure you know, the buzz on it has been tremendous for about 25 years now, since it was “rediscovered” and labeled one of the best movies of the 1960s, maybe even of all time. And with good reason. It stars Lee Marvin and Angie Dickinson, along with a sturdy supporting cast of well-known character actors. Marvin is without question one of the most watchable actors ever to walk onto the silver screen. With a role like this one, a revenge-seeking criminal whose partners have betrayed him, robbed him, and left him for dead, I’m thinking “No wonder everyone loves this film. It has everything going for it!”

I didn’t like it.

I didn’t hate it. I just didn’t like it is all.

For me the film had the look of a 1960s TV show. It was visually flat, lifeless and never seemed like anything more than a made-for-TV movie. Of course, the sex and violence elevated it out of the TV realm, but visually, it didn’t do it for me. The whole thing just lay there on the screen, pale and cold. Certain scenes filmed in the dark looked okay–the finale, for instance–but the daylight scenes were straight out of late ’60s network television, complete with all the standard, clichéd LA locations.

I knew there would be a problem as soon as I saw the opening credits. They were done in quick, sharp cuts, a la TV, as opposed to the softer, more subtle dissolves traditionally found in films. The sets were godawful and the harsh lighting didn’t do anyone any favors. The closeup of the broken toiletry bottles and their swirling fluids is a perfect example of ’60s excess. By 1970, all that stuff was passé.

Then there’s the story.

I know, I know, it’s great. But think about this. The story couldn’t've taken place at all if John Vernon had killed Lee Marvin, which he fully intended to do, instead of shooting him, looking at him, and running away. You remember the scene, right? There was no one around to hear the shots, Marvin was on the floor with two in him already. What’s one or two more? Preferably in the head. At least you’ll know he’s dead, which any self-respecting double-crosser will go out of his way to do.

Angie Dickinson was completely wasted yet again, as she was in so many of those 1960s movies. The scene where she slapped Marvin a few times was good, but that was about it. I never bought into her as a character. I could see her “acting” the whole time.

I lay most of this muckery at the feet of the director, John Boorman. Given the story, this film should have overflowed with grit, but it comes off as remarkably sanitized. But wait, you say, Boorman’s the guy who directed Deliverance. And The Tailor Of Panama. Surely he knows what he’s doing. Surely he’s great!

Well, yes, he did direct those outstanding films, along with a few others. But they came much later. Point Blank was really his first directorial effort (if you don’t count his UK film about the Dave Clark Five). He was feeling his way around, and let’s face it, he really didn’t know what he was doing. He was handed a terrific story with a great cast and a Hollywood budget, but he came up short.

The sad fact is, without Marvin’s compelling screen presence, this movie would be long forgotten and deservedly so.

All right, Mr DeMille, I’m ready for the tomatoes now.

THEY’RE INTOXICATED BY “SETUP ON FRONT STREET”!

Posted by Mike Dennis | Posted in Reviews | Posted on Tuesday, September 13, 2011 at 7:58 AM

Tagged Under : ,

Christina Irelan over at IntoxicatedByBooks.blogspot.com has reviewed Setup On Front Street and has said some very kind things about it. I would urge everyone to check it out here and please leave a comment, okay? It would not only help me, but it would help Christina as well. She’s definitely one of the “good guys”.

NOIR JOURNAL REVIEWS “SETUP ON FRONT STREET”

Posted by Mike Dennis | Posted in Reviews | Posted on Monday, August 15, 2011 at 10:15 AM

Tagged Under : , , , ,

Michael Lipkin’s respected Noir Journal has reviewed Setup On Front Street. I have to say the reviewer, MC Pastoret, totally got it. Nothing could please me more. A big thanks to Michael and MC for giving my novel the opportunity to be seen on that great site.

Check out his review here. And then, please leave a brief comment, okay? Michael’s site is a haven for noir fans, and it deserves plenty of support. In fact, I’m adding a permanent link to it here under “Other Hotspots”.

DANA KING TAKES A BITE OF “SETUP ON FRONT STREET”

Posted by Mike Dennis | Posted in Reviews | Posted on Friday, July 1, 2011 at 4:50 PM

Tagged Under : , ,

Dana King has done a review of Setup On Front Street in the “monthly best reads” edition of his blog, One Bite At A Time. He said some very nice things, which I truly appreciate. I would further appreciate it if all readers of this post would go to his blog right now and check it out, then leave a brief comment. Dana’s one of the good guys.

Hey, how can he not be? He’s a former musician.

BIG AL’S MY BEST PAL

Posted by Mike Dennis | Posted in Reviews | Posted on Wednesday, June 29, 2011 at 1:39 PM

Tagged Under : , , , , , , ,

Big Al, over at BooksAndPals.blogspot.com, has reviewed my short story collection, Bloodstains On The Wall, and given it 4 stars (out of a possible 5). You can check it out here. It’s clear to me from his review that he totally gets noir and has therefore earned a place in my pantheon of Guys With Great Insight. If you have a moment, please go there and leave a brief comment.

And while you’re there, check out some of his other reviews, equally insightful, including a now-classic review of The Greek Seaman by Jacqueline Howett. That one has so far attracted 309 comments. That’s not a misprint. 309! Believe me when I tell you, all of cyberspace was buzzing about this review and the subsequent comments. It’s worth a look.

LOVETHYAUTHOR.COM GETS MY LOVE

Posted by Mike Dennis | Posted in Published Works, Reviews | Posted on Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 9:09 PM

Tagged Under : ,

The folks over at LoveThyAuthor.com have reviewed Setup On Front Street, and have seen fit to give it 4.7 stars (out of a possible 5). You can check out the review here. When you go there, please check out the rest of the site. It’s pretty impressive. And if you have a moment, please leave a brief comment. Thanks.

UPON FURTHER REVIEW…

Posted by Mike Dennis | Posted in Personal, Reviews, The Business Of Writing | Posted on Friday, June 10, 2011 at 10:48 PM

Tagged Under : , , , , ,

Now that I have several books out, they’re starting to get some reviews. So far, most of them have been pretty good, if I do say so myself. And to those reviewers on the various websites that looked at my books, as well as to those readers who wrote their own reviews and put them up on Amazon, I offer my heartfelt thanks. I truly appreciate the kind words, but more than that, I appreciate that you took the time from your own schedules to write those reviews, no matter how brief.

It’s to the readers that I now speak. You bought my book(s), whether in ebook or paperback form, with your hard-earned money, and I hope you felt it was well-spent. Some of you are in the group I mentioned above, that is, you put your thoughts and impressions of the book into a review and put it up on Amazon or Barnes & Noble or LibraryThing or whatever.

Some of you, however, have elected not to write a review. I know your time is valuable and perhaps you just don’t care to do it. I get it. But I want to ask you to reconsider for the following reasons.

I don’t seek reviews for ego purposes. Yes, it’s uplifting when someone I don’t know writes something nice about my novel. That, however, is not the purpose of a review. The more reviews any of my books get, especially if they’re good reviews, it will show potential readers that other folks just like them have tried my books and (I would hope) liked them. The greater the number of reviews a book can display on its Amazon page, the greater the chance that someone will buy that book. It’s really that simple. That’s one of the best ways to create buzz.

So I would humbly ask, if you liked any of my books, please go to Amazon and write a brief review of it. It can be as long or as short as you want, and it doesn’t matter that you’re not really a book reviewer. Neither are 99% of the people who write Amazon reviews.

Here are the pages you can go to. Find the page for the book you read and go there. On Amazon, you just scroll down and you’ll see “Create Your Own Review” on the right side. On Barnes & Noble, scroll down and you’ll see “Write a Review”. If you can spare a couple of minutes to do this, it would mean a lot to me. I thank you in advance.

Setup On Front Street / Amazon, Barnes & Noble

Bloodstains On The Wall / Amazon, Barnes & Noble

The Take / Amazon, Barnes & Noble